Wisconsin Votes to Limit Collection of Fees by Unions
By MONICA DAVEY
MARCH 6, 2015 - New York Times
MADISON, Wis. — The State Assembly
on Friday approved legislation barring unions from requiring workers to pay the
equivalent of dues, leaving Wisconsin poised to become the 25th state with what
advocates describe as a right-to-work law.
Gov.
Scott Walker, who said before he was re-elected
to a second term in November that he did not expect right-to-work
legislation to be taken up this session, has since said that he will sign the
measure within days. The move was expected to burnish Mr. Walkerfs image as a
conservative willing to take on unions as he flirts with a run for the
Republican nomination for president.
It also further shifts the climate
in the Midwest when it comes to unions. Wisconsinfs action follows similar moves
in recent years by Indiana and Michigan. Gov. Bruce Rauner of Illinois said
last month that he would end a requirement that all state workers pay the
equivalent of dues, and on Thursday, labor
unions filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate his action.
Though the legislation has stalled
in some state legislatures for years, it moved with remarkable speed through
Wisconsinfs Republican-controlled Capitol, passing both chambers in a few
weeks.
Union members rallied outside the
Capitol building in frigid temperatures on Thursday, as they had in recent days,
but their numbers were far smaller than the tens
of thousands who gathered here in 2011 when Mr. Walker pressed to cut
collective bargaining rights for most public-sector workers. The new bill will
affect private-sector workers.
The State Assembly, which includes
63 Republicans and 36 Democrats, passed the bill(S.44) 62-35, along partisan lines.
Last week, the State Senate passed the bill, 17 to 15, also mainly on party
lines.
In hours of debate that ran all
night Thursday and into Friday, Democrats denounced the measure as one likely to
diminish wages for workers in the state. They said it was aimed, too, at
lessening the political power of unions in a state with a rich history in the
labor movement.
gRight to work is desperately
wrong for Wisconsin,h said Peter Barca, the minority leader in the Assembly. gIn
fact, I canft think of any policy thatfs more antithetical to Wisconsin values,
to our very heritage, to the Wisconsin way of doing business than this
bill.h
Mr. Barca alluded to the early
20th-century progressivism of Robert M. La Follette Sr., whose bust sits in the
Capitol. gFiguratively, you are taking a sledgehammer to his bust,h Mr. Barca
told the Republicans. gLiterally you are tearing away, week by week, his very
legacy that made this state great.h
But Robin Vos, the Republican
speaker, said much of the information spread about the effects of right-to-work
bills was wrong. In places like Indiana with similar measures, he said, unions
have not shrunk and jobs have grown. gFor the people who believe in a union,
this is not going to have any impact at all,h he said. But for those who feel
they are not represented well by a union, Mr. Vos said, this would allow an
option. gIfm going to take my money and vote with my checkbook.h
At times, the atmosphere grew
chaotic here. At one point, protesters in the galleries of the State Assembly
chamber began chanting as Republicans spoke: gRight to work is wrong for
Wisconsinh; gUnions built the working class.h Officials then cleared the
galleries.